One more restatement

I'm trying to get this as crisp as possible in my mind:

Chapter 1: You can't eliminate epistemic normativity through reason.
Chapter 2: There are unjustified epistemic beliefs, so why not build moral realism into them.
Chapter 3: The reliability challenge against moral realism is just the reliability challenge against epistemology, and answering both involves nothing but the faith that we're not massively deceived.